Superman review: Unpacking the movie’s geeky weirdness

Superman’s latest cinematic adventure takes a bold but uneven step into the future of DC’s superhero universe, blending eccentric humor with high-stakes action in a film that feels both overstuffed and insubstantial. With David Corenswet stepping into the iconic role, the new film offers comic book fans a whirlwind of nostalgic references and outlandish sci-fi flourishes, though it risks alienating wider audiences with its frenzied pacing and lack of emotional grounding.

The film marks the debut of DC’s ambitious new cinematic universe following the conclusion of its previous iteration, which stumbled with a series of underwhelming releases in 2023. Helmed by James Gunn, known for his work on Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy and DC’s The Suicide Squad, this new chapter aims to redefine the superhero genre within the DC franchise. Rather than cautiously laying the foundation for future stories, Gunn plunges headfirst into the action, delivering a spectacle that feels more like the continuation of an established saga than the beginning of a new era.

From the outset, viewers are thrust into a world where Superman has already become a familiar figure, protecting Metropolis for several years. He is romantically involved with the determined Lois Lane, portrayed by Rachel Brosnahan, and faces opposition from the villainous Lex Luthor, played with cold intensity by Nicholas Hoult. Interestingly, the film introduces several lesser-known superheroes alongside Superman, including Green Lantern, Mr. Terrific, and Hawkgirl, who form a morally ambiguous Justice Gang that both aids and complicates his mission.

Este enfoque para omitir la conocida historia de origen brinda un cambio de ritmo revitalizante. El público se ahorra la narrativa habitual de Krypton y Smallville, sumergiéndose directamente en el mundo dinámico de metahumanos y confrontaciones épicas. La incorporación de elementos inusuales como Krypto el Superperro y un equipo de asistentes robóticos de Superman añade un toque caprichoso no comúnmente presente en anteriores representaciones del personaje. Estas adiciones juguetonas evocan una sensación de autenticidad de cómic, atrayendo a los fanáticos de mucho tiempo que buscan un respiro del tono serio de películas anteriores.

Nonetheless, this distinctly unusual vision brings its own set of challenges. Gunn’s choice to fill the story with a bewildering assortment of ideas—duplicates, parallel worlds, strange beings, and societal observations—results in an experience that appears chaotic and lacking direction. The movie rushes through important story elements without allowing much space for character depth or emotional connection. Significant happenings like city-wide devastation and cross-dimensional journeys occur so swiftly that they reduce their possible effect, leaving viewers with brief impressions instead of enduring memories.

Although the visual effects are intricate, they add to the movie’s transient nature. The action is akin to a premium video game, featuring chaotic and destructive scenes that seem removed from real life. Even with references to the magnificence of Richard Donner’s 1978 Superman, like John Williams’ legendary score, the film finds it challenging to inspire comparable wonder. Ultimately, it presents a spectacle that captivates briefly but lacks the emotional depth needed for the audience to genuinely engage with the storyline.

In this iteration of Superman, David Corenswet takes on the lead role, introducing a timeless and genuine appeal to the character of Superman as well as his other identity, Clark Kent. However, the script doesn’t fully allow him to demonstrate the iconic kindness and empathy associated with the role. The portrayal tends to emphasize a hasty nature, as the Man of Steel frequently shows signs of irritation and mood swings, especially in scenes with Lois Lane. This approach diminishes the character’s usual portrayal as a steadfast symbol of optimism and ethical certainty, making it challenging for viewers to relate to him on a more profound level.

The film’s rapid pace and emphasis on eccentricity suggest a creative vision driven more by indulgence than careful storytelling. Gunn appears to have approached the project with the mindset of cramming as much as possible into a single film, possibly out of concern that this opportunity might be short-lived. The result is an uneven mix of inventive humor and superficial spectacle that may delight comic book enthusiasts but leave mainstream viewers indifferent.

While the film’s ambition and playful tone are commendable, the lack of narrative cohesion and emotional depth hampers its effectiveness as the cornerstone of a new cinematic universe. The inclusion of whimsical elements, while entertaining, feels insufficient to carry the weight of the film’s larger thematic aspirations. The absence of quieter moments to explore Superman’s humanity and the moral dilemmas of his role further diminishes the story’s impact.

Ultimately, this version of Superman represents both a daring attempt and an unfulfilled chance. It presents an imaginative, humor-filled universe that steers away from the somber tone of earlier installments but doesn’t manage to leave a powerful, enduring impact. The movie’s high-energy and packed storyline might attract loyal comic enthusiasts, yet its inability to create a grounded, accessible Superman might limit its appeal to a wider audience.

James Gunn’s signature style—quirky, irreverent, and unabashedly geeky—shines throughout the film, offering moments of genuine amusement and surprise. Yet the absence of emotional stakes and the relentless pacing result in a cinematic experience that is entertaining in the moment but forgettable in the long run. As DC embarks on this new cinematic journey, one can only hope that future installments will find a better balance between spectacle and substance, ensuring that Superman once again becomes not just a symbol of power, but a hero whose story truly matters.